The recent report issued by Danbury State’s Attorney Stephen J. Sedensky III may not be the definitive account of the Newtown shootings of nearly one year ago, but the 48-page document is worth reading. Perhaps not so much for what it finds as it what it doesn’t — a clear motive to explain what caused 20-year-old Adam Lanza to kill his mother and take the lives of 26 others, including 20 children at Sandy Hook Elementary.
The circumstances of the killer’s life are chilling yet oddly familiar, as if copied from similar tragedies of the recent past. He had a fascination with Columbine, death and violent first-person shooter video games, his collection of which included “School Shooting.” He was isolated, had a “history of significant mental health issues” and owned a variety of firearms including the Bushmaster rifle he used to kill his victims before shooting himself with a Glock pistol.
In retrospect, the signs of a damaged mind seem inescapable. His bedroom windows were taped over with plastic garbage bags. He communicated with his mother only by email even though they lived in the same house. He tracked mass murderers by spreadsheet. He had images of himself holding a gun to his head and pictures of dead bodies.
See more stories »
New law won’t stop criminals from getting guns Mental illness and gun violenceMd. gun rights lawsuits are firing blanks Why Marylanders support our new gun control laws Maryland gun control lawsuit [Poll] Gun control need not be a lost cause Gun violence: Get used to it Fight crime with secure buildings, more jail time Biden’s shotgun tip deserves a blast Ultimate test of Md.’s new gun law Don’t blame Starbucks for caving to the gun lobby Well-loved children don’t commit mass murder Mass shooting points to problems, including a culture of violenceEnding mass shootings: It’s not just about more or better laws Navy Yard killer and the nation’s culture of violencePreoccupied with Syria, Obama does little to address the latest mass shootingAmerica’s gun insanityStarbucks policy on guns [Poll]Starbucks caves to the radical gun lobby Don’t blame police for background check backlog Biased writing on guns Sun offers only diatribe on gun background check dispute Gun owners aren’t paranoid, just realistic State police cannot farm out background check workBadly targeted gun gripes Blame O’Malley, not gun dealersKeep guns out of the wrong handsImpatient gun buyers, dealers are acting like toddlersMaryland’s reckless gun dealersMaryland’s ‘lawless sheriffs’ are upholding our constitutional rightsMaryland’s missing gunsLawless sheriffs? Try a lawless presidentSelective enforcement of the law is nothing newCardin gets the Constitution wrongThe lawless sheriffs of Maryland Courts, not sheriffs, interpret the ConstitutionTyranny and gunsSheriff’s refusal to enforce gun law is a victory for the peopleOpposing Md.’s new gun control law doesn’t make one an ignoramusLong waits for gun background checks are more than an inconvenience; they’re a sign of incompetencePacking heat with your hot coffeeMaryland’s gun background check backlogDouble standard on Md. gun lawThe booboisie emerges victoriousThe daydream of self-defense with gunsBetter ways to protect schools than gun lawCarroll County’s fantasy fortressWillful ignorance on gunsSun wrong on gun law’s consequences Carroll County’s gun law nullification fantasyGun research a waste of time, moneyPanicked gun buying and the NRAHopkins gun research is not biasedNew Md. gun law misfiresThe Sun loves the First Amendment but not the SecondMaryland’s model for gun regulationGun advocates should take aim at real scandalsAfter stun guns, legalized bazookas?Ignoring the real while fighting the imaginaryGun control opponents will face voters’ wrathNRA should accept universal background checksWhose side is the NRA on?When 5-year-olds are shooting 2-year-olds…Who cares if Germans have to register their guns? This is AmericaA phobia for firearms?The Bavarian case for registering guns Vietnam veteran deeply concerned by inaction of Congress on gun controlThe myths of background checksLaw-abiding gun owners aren’t the problemThe NRA has finally been marginalizedAmericans have been ill served by the NRA’s bullying tacticsWe accept a surveillance state but not gun control?Filibuster rules at heart of gun bill ‘defeat’Swift justice for suspected Boston bomberGun vote shows politicians have been bought and paid for by the NRAFight against gun violence must go on despite setback in the SenateWhy should gun nuts prevail?Shame on you, senatorsFoes of expanded checks on gun purchases will have victims’ blood on their handsCitizens must unite to stop the senseless slaughter by gun violenceOutgunned at the DC CorralShame on the Senate; send ’em all homeIn Senate gun control vote, tyranny of the minorityGun control never stops at straw buyersGun control helpful but misrepresentedThe hidden agenda of the gun rights lobbyStraw purchases already bannedThe false security of gun-control measuresDon’t our children deserve armed protectors?Delaying gun legislation will cost livesStop ‘straw buyers’ from purchasing guns for criminalsHow could 31 Senators vote against debating expanded background checks?Arm teachers? No wayPetition Maryland’s unconstitutional gun bill to referendum
The report notes that Nancy Lanza had privately expressed concerns about her son’s mental state and planned to sell their home and move elsewhere so that he might enroll in a special school or find meaningful work. Socially awkward and possibly bullied as a child (witness accounts are contradictory on this point), he was described by classmates as a loner who made few friends growing up. He had stopped communicating with his divorced, remarried father.
The only reference to mental health treatment is to note that he was diagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome in 2005, suffered from anxiety, obsessive compulsive disorder and did not have empathy and followed a “rigid” thought process. The report makes reference to mental health providers and “evaluations” over the years and claims he refused therapies and medications.
Mr. Sedensky concludes that whatever mental health problems Mr. Lanza may have experienced, he had failed to seek appropriate treatment for them. “As an adult he did not recognize or help himself deal with those issues,” the prosecutor writes. “What contribution this made to the shootings, if any, is unknown…”
Implicit in this observation is the inference that Mr. Lanza had access to appropriate care, that he was capable of recognizing his ailments for what they represented and seek treatment, and that those around him, his mother included, had acted responsibly. In this, Mr. Sedensky reveals a prosecutor’s bias — the desire to strip the perpetrator of any possible defenses that might lessen his guilt. But that doesn’t address the larger question of how such incidents might be prevented from happening in the first place — how best to protect society.
Not every person with a mental disorder has access to appropriate mental health care, nor is every person suffering from a serious illness capable of recognizing that fact. That is like expecting a person with a broken leg to walk to the hospital. It is the injury that prevents it. One may as well punish Alzheimer’s patients for forgetfulness as expect those who hear voices in their heads to recognize they are imagined.
Much progress has been made for mental health “parity” in recent months, including through the minimum standards of health insurance required by the Affordable Care Act. But there are clearly still holes in the safety net. In Virginia last month, a 55-year-old state senator was stabbed multiple times by his troubled 24-year-old son who then shot himself. The young man had undergone a psychiatric evaluation but was not admitted — allegedly because a psychiatric room wasn’t available in their rural part of the state.
Most people with a mental illness do not stab their fathers or walk into elementary schools with an arsenal of weapons. They are not likely to be violent, and when they are, they more likely to hurt themselves than others. But not having access to appropriate mental health care? That happens every day. Studies show access to mental health care in this country is worse than any other medical specialty. Nearly 90 million Americans live in federally-designated Mental Health Professional Shortage Areas. And an even bigger barrier is often societal attitudes toward mental health problems — that these are issues that shouldn’t require the help of others.
Mental health care in this country is too costly and too difficult to obtain. That families and friends of those who suffer mental disorders are ill-prepared to act should come as no surprise, given the stigma and misconceptions that surround these illnesses. The exact motivations behind the Newtown shooting may never be known, but our failure to recognize disorders and provide appropriate medical care for individuals like Adam Lanza is clear enough.
To respond to this editorial, send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org. Please include your name and contact information.